Skip to main content

MICHIGAN PROPERTY TAX LAW

Proposal A and the Michigan Property Tax Cap

Proposal A has shaped Michigan property taxes since 1994. If you own or are acquiring commercial property, understanding how this constitutional amendment works is the first step to managing your tax exposure.

THE MECHANICS

How Proposal A Controls Your Property Taxes

Passed by Michigan voters in 1994, Proposal A amended the state constitution to limit how fast property taxes can grow. Here's how the system works in practice.

01

Annual Taxable Value Is Capped

Each year, your property's taxable value can increase by no more than the lesser of 5% or the rate of inflation (CPI). Even if your property's market value jumps 15% in a single year, your taxable value stays capped.

02

A Gap Grows Over Time

Because market values typically outpace the cap, a widening gap forms between the assessed value (SEV) and the lower taxable value. Properties held for 10 or 20 years can accumulate enormous gaps — meaning the owner pays taxes on a fraction of the property's true value.

03

The Cap Resets on Transfer

When the property sells or transfers, the taxable value uncaps and resets to the full SEV. The new owner inherits the true tax burden overnight. This is the "pop-up tax" that catches so many buyers off guard.

THE POP-UP TAX

Why Buyers Pay Dramatically More Than Previous Owners

The pop-up tax is the practical consequence of Proposal A. It refers to the sudden increase in property taxes that occurs when a property transfers and the taxable value resets from its capped level to the full State Equalized Value.

Consider a commercial property with an SEV of $1.5 million but a capped taxable value of just $800,000. The previous owner pays taxes on $800,000. The day after you close, you pay taxes on $1.5 million — nearly double. This applies to all property types: residential, commercial, and industrial.

For investors and portfolio operators, the pop-up tax is not just a surprise — it can fundamentally change the economics of a deal. That's why factoring uncapping into your acquisition due diligence is essential.

Property owner reviewing unexpected tax increase

YOUR RIGHTS UNDER PROPOSAL A

What Commercial Owners Can Still Control

Proposal A caps the rate of increase — it does not guarantee the assessed value is correct. Even after uncapping, you have the right to challenge your property's SEV if it overstates market value. Many assessors rely on outdated data, miss income and vacancy issues, or apply incorrect property classifications. Filing with the Michigan Tax Tribunal is how you correct it.

Appeal the assessed value (SEV) if it exceeds true market value

Challenge the property classification if it's incorrect

Request a review of the assessor's comparable sales data

File before the May 31 Michigan Tax Tribunal deadline

Reduce your ongoing tax base for future years

THE DECISION

Proposal A Doesn't Mean You're Stuck

The tax cap protects long-term owners, but it doesn't help buyers after a transfer. What you do next determines whether you overpay for years or take control of your tax burden.

When You Challenge the Assessment

Taxable value reflects actual market conditions, not inflated estimates

Reduced tax base carries forward into future years under the cap

Acquisition underwriting accounts for true post-closing tax exposure

Portfolio-wide savings compound across multiple Michigan properties

When You Accept the Default

You pay taxes on an uncapped value the assessor set — often too high

Overpayment compounds year after year under the new capped baseline

Missed deadline means waiting another full year to file

Acquisition returns erode from tax burden you never needed to carry

Before Proposal A passed in 1994, there was no constitutional limit on how much a property's taxable value could increase each year. Proposal A amended the Michigan Constitution to cap annual taxable value increases at the lesser of 5% or the rate of inflation (CPI). It also shifted school funding from local property taxes to a statewide system. For property owners, the most significant impact is the cap on taxable value growth — and the uncapping event that resets it upon transfer. Be sure to review all property tax deadlines so you don't miss your window to appeal.

Yes. Proposal A applies to all property types in Michigan — residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural. The annual taxable value cap and the uncapping rules on transfer work the same way regardless of property classification. Commercial and industrial properties, however, often have larger gaps between SEV and taxable value because of higher appreciation rates and longer hold periods. This is especially common in fast-appreciating markets — and the 2026 Michigan assessment increases have put Prop A caps squarely back in scope for commercial owners in counties like Wayne County and Oakland County.

The pop-up tax is the difference between what the previous owner paid (based on the capped taxable value) and what the new owner pays (based on the full SEV after uncapping). It is not a separate tax — it's the direct result of the taxable value resetting to the uncapped level the year after a transfer. For example, if a property's capped taxable value was $500,000 and the SEV is $900,000, the new owner's tax base jumps by $400,000 overnight, and multiplying that $400,000 by the local millage rate gives you the annual dollar impact. In high-millage Michigan counties that number can easily run into the tens of thousands per year, which is why factoring the pop-up into acquisition underwriting matters so much. Read our Michigan uncapping guide for a deeper walkthrough of how the reset is applied.

Absolutely. The uncapping itself is a legal mechanism under Proposal A, but the assessed value (SEV) that your taxable value uncaps to is still subject to challenge. If the assessor has overvalued your property — using bad comparables, ignoring vacancy, or misclassifying the property — you have every right to file an appeal with the Michigan Tax Tribunal. Reducing the SEV reduces the value your taxes uncap to, which produces savings in the current year and lowers the baseline from which Proposal A's cap begins running again. That dual effect is why post-purchase appeals are among the most valuable cases we handle. Prop A caps are most often litigated first through the March Michigan Board of Review and then escalated to the Michigan Tax Tribunal process for the full procedure.

The cap remains in place for as long as the same owner holds the property and no transfer of ownership occurs. In practice that means the Proposal A protection can last for decades on long-held commercial and industrial properties, producing an enormous gap between the taxable value and the SEV by the time the property finally changes hands. The cap resets every year according to the lesser of 5% or inflation, so in low-inflation years the gap can widen quickly relative to actual market growth. Once the property transfers, though, the cap snaps off and the new owner starts fresh from the uncapped SEV. For portfolio owners, managing Proposal A across multiple Michigan properties is one of the most impactful levers in their tax strategy.

Proposal A caps the annual growth of your taxable value — it does not cap the millage rate itself. Millage rates are set locally by school districts, counties, cities, townships, and special-purpose authorities, and they can rise through voter-approved operating millages, debt millages, and other ballot measures. That means even if your taxable value is capped, your total tax bill can still grow if the local millage rates increase. The two levers work independently, and the only way to control the value side of the equation is to make sure your SEV accurately reflects true cash value. Read about why commercial property taxes increase for a full breakdown of how millage and value interact.

Every Michigan acquisition should model the post-uncapping tax burden as part of due diligence. Look at the current SEV versus the capped taxable value to estimate the pop-up tax. Then assess whether the SEV is accurate or inflated relative to the purchase price and market conditions. Buyers should also evaluate how any Michigan special acts abatements on the property interact with Proposal A — PA 198 and PA 210 treatments can materially change the post-closing tax picture. Smart buyers budget for the uncapping hit and plan to appeal the assessment immediately after closing to bring the tax base in line with reality. Start with a Free Property Tax Review to see what savings are possible.

Commercial property tax appeal background

MICHIGAN PROPERTY TAX APPEALS

Don't Let an Inflated Assessment Define Your Tax Burden

Proposal A resets your taxable value on transfer, but it doesn't guarantee the assessment is right. We review your property's SEV, identify overvaluations, and file before the deadline. No fee unless we reduce your taxes.

Michigan state capitol building representing Proposal A property tax law